http://froknowsphoto.com/digital-photography-how-to-new-york-fashion-week-day-one-part-2/ Here I show the differences and similarities of shooting with film …
Video Rating: 4 / 5
http://froknowsphoto.com/digital-photography-how-to-new-york-fashion-week-day-one-part-2/ Here I show the differences and similarities of shooting with film …
Video Rating: 4 / 5
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The one on the right is basically the same as the left, just with grain.
That graininess can be added in Photoshop. Complaining that your digital
pics dont look grainy like film is like complaining that you cant take B&W
pics with digital like you can with B&W film, so digital must suck.
I’ll take digital any day, and leave the film cameras to the hipsters.
I would have to agree with Brent Long on this one, the tonality is
definatelty different within these two shots. That being said the digital
image still holds up. Cheers Pete.
What if, instead of comparing both in a digital format, you printed the
digital and did a comparison of prints?
having less shoots is definetly not a valid argument
Film is a religion with a god you can actually see.
My 1st camera was a OM1n, back in 1976, I love film and I miss film. I
shoot with a Canon A1 + FD 55mm f1.2 one roll/month just to keep in touch.
There is no way I am gong back to film though.
The afro- dude looks like the actor from Fame.
We have the same film camera!
Obsolete Video. Today, 2014, digital photography is better than analog
photography. Ok, some conservative people love analog photography,
phonograph, Cassette deck, old-fashioned manual burr-mill coffee grinder,
cine-camera. But today, the digital world is better also…from the point
of view of the resolution. Only the viewfinder in digital cameras is still
primitive. The viewfinder of the digital camera is still just a PEEPHOLE!
Now do Medium and Large Format Film. You’ll be glad you did!
No thanks I’ll stick to digital I enjoy it a lot more.
All propaganda. If you are’t shooting in manual in digital … then you
aren’t being a photographer. Its a skill-set based on skill … not
equipment. That’s all I’m saying.
Have found that film has the ability to capture much more to Tonality than
digital can in it’s current format. Also with a medium format film camera I
have seen sharpness to be a much higher rendering then current 35mm cameras
in the digital format. These findings are completely objective when
observed under a high dpi scan. With that said I feel that digital cameras
will eventually catch up to the qualities of a medium format camera in the
future.
I’m watching this video because my dad find his Canon AE 1 program and I
really want to learn of this I Really didn’t knew he likes them on this 15
years and I Really like photography Im always taking pictures to everything
and it’s get me happy that my dad at his 22 years (past) like photography
to …now he kinda forget how to use it xD :)
the one on the left does not look as sharp in allot of places because i’m
guessing the nikon focused on the face where the zenit was focused on the
shirt. Chances are the lens on the zenit was also allot sharper than the
nikon since allot of russian lenses are very good copies of zeiss and leica
lenses.
This argument will continue into eternity. There is no sense arguing about
this subject. Just use the medium you like, and get over yourself.
Why can’t a pro use auto modes on his or her camera? That is the whole
point of modern cameras, to make it easier for photographer. If auto modes
make you less of a photographer then why do they put these modes on pro
level cameras?
Your digital shot has more middle range tonality than your b&w… what kind
of film did you use?
I’m really surprised you can find cheap soviet camera in USA! For the
anecdot ,I’m french and I was travelling to New York in January ,my aparel
is a Zenith C ,and at the airport when the guy see the “cccp” logo on it
…the control was long and fastidious..
digital = gas bbq
film = charcoal
Great video. Thanks for the valuable info.
how did you change the film negative photo into digital photo ?
whos left ur or mine
The image on the right, shot with the Zenit looks superior to me, it is
sharper for one thing. Look at the sleeve on his tee shirt where it
surround his arm, clearly sharper plus the shadow in his arm pit is true
black and looks more natural. People mocked the cheap and cheerful Soviet
Zenit camera’s but a lot of the images taken with them are very good, their
in house Helios lenses were always superb optically and very affordable. We
should never take film for granted, digital photography has been promoted
with a lot of hype!
Digital = Justin Bieber
Analogue = Wolgang Amadeus Mozart
Actually at my art college we scanned in 35mm film at 12600 dpi, we got
images of 12600x 18000 (on an Epson v750 flatbed) Not even our d800’s get
close to that.
Sorry, kind of disagree how the right one is better.
The left side of the face is over blown, no detail at all. The softness on
the left photo is more eye pleasing as a portrait. But if you want to bring
in so called artistic point of view into the equation and it becomes a
matter of personal interest.