Free learning from The Open University http://www.open.edu/openlearn/science-maths-technology/science/physics-and-astronomy — Andrew Norton shows what happ…
Free learning from The Open University http://www.open.edu/openlearn/science-maths-technology/science/physics-and-astronomy — Andrew Norton shows what happ…
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This video is excellent and has significantly improved my understanding of
diffraction
In a more dense medium, the speed of the wave would be slower. This means
that for the same frequency of a water wave, a mercury wave would have a
shorter wavelength. This would mean less diffraction. Just remember that
the wave speed is inversely proportional to the density of the medium.
That’s true, I didn’t know that higher concentration led greater wave
speed. With the shear modulus though, that’s only the case for a solid
medium (I think, like a rope or something). I know physics, but not so much
chemistry lol.
That funny moment when You’re asked to help the teacher in the lab’ –‘
is it just me or there are interference patterns in a single slit
diffraction around 1:12 and 2:00?
thanks. People say that higher individual mass of the particle causes the
wave to slow down. But the higher concentration of these particles causes
the wave to speed up. Plus one has to account for
“stiffness”(Shear_modulus) of the material and compressibility. The problem
I see with “density” is it only tells us the amount of mass per volume. It
doesn’t tell us anything about distance between the molecules or how these
molecules “interact” between each-other.
does anyone know how diffraction would change if one uses mercury instead
of water? or oil? or kerosine? Are there any formulas that can link
diffraction with density of the medium? if any?
This is excellent. My class will really benefit from seeing this.